Making an In-Person Public Comment at An Upcoming Council Meeting
Council welcomes public comments at each regularly scheduled Monday evening Council meeting.
If you are interested in speaking at a Cleveland City Council, please read the revised rules and procedures for public comments and fill out the online form below.
Submitting a Registration to Speak
Anyone who is interested in addressing Cleveland City Council at a public meeting must register with City Council prior to that meeting.
Registrations may be submitted:
- By using the online form below
- In person at Cleveland City Hall, Room 220, 601 Lakeside Avenue NE. Paper forms are available to register.
- By downloading this form, filling it out, and emailing it to publiccomment@clevelandcitycouncil.gov or dropping it off at Council offices.
Registration Periods
Registrations will ONLY be accepted between Noon on Wednesday and 2:00 pm on the same day as a regularly scheduled Monday evening Council Meeting.
Council allows no more than 10 people to comment at its regularly scheduled Monday night meetings. Registration will close as soon as the first 10 people sign up. Each registrant will be allotted 3 minutes to speak.
Registrations will only be accepted for making comments at the next regular meeting; registrations for any future meeting will not be accepted until the Wednesday before the meeting. Early, incomplete, or false registrations will be rejected.
Notice of Registration
If your registration is successful, you will be notified by email or phone.
Accommodations
If you need assistance due to a language barrier or disability, please let us know at least three (3) days in advance by going here to make a request.
Attending Council Meetings
Cleveland City Council meetings are held in the Council Chamber on the second floor of Cleveland City Hall, 601 Lakeside Avenue, East.
Visitors may park for free at the upper lot behind City Hall after 5:00 pm on days when Council is meeting.
Public Record
Please remember that all registration information and public comments are public records and can be subject to public record requests.
Decorum
Cleveland City Council must maintain orderly, efficient, and productive meetings to ensure the important business of city government is completed. Council has developed a set of rules and procedures that allow the public to be heard in a fair and orderly manner. These rules and procedures apply to all speakers, and Council does not discriminate based on the speaker's identity or viewpoint or the content of the speech. Please read Council's revised rules and procedures for public comments before you register and before you appear before City Council.
Please note: Anyone attending a Cleveland City Council meeting is prohibited from engaging in any action or behavior that substantially interrupts, delays, or disturbs the due conduct of the proceedings of the Council; such conduct includes but is not limited to: handclapping, stomping of feet, whistling, making other loud noises, yelling, or similar demonstrations. Any person who violates any of the above may be immediately removed from the Council Chamber.
Rules for Speakers
- Speakers may not yield their time to other speakers.
- Speakers shall only address the topic they registered to speak about.
- Speakers' comments shall not be frivolous or repetitive.
- Speakers shall not use language that is obscene or likely to produce imminent unlawful action.
- Speakers shall address all comments to the presiding officer.
Prohibited Items
- Signs, posters, banners, placards, or similar items
- Food and drink
Make a Comment In Person at a Council Meeting
To sign up to speak during the registration period (Noon Wednesday through 2:00 pm Monday before Council Meetings) click this button.
You will be notified by email or phone if you are one of the ten people who will speak.
Make a Comment Online
If you would rather submit your comments in writing, please fill out the form below.
Written public comments will be published on this page and delivered to all Councilmembers before the next full Council Meeting after they have been submitted.
Public Comments
Filter By
Cleveland Commission on Black Women and Girls
I am Dr. T. Carter, founder of Black Women Coping in Community an organization birthed from the plight of the black women coping in Cleveland. Established to provide creative cathartic spaces for black women to engage, be empowered, and supported.
As a black woman currently coping in the city of Cleveland of Ohio I am both saddened and excited by the possibilities of this conversation today. I am saddened that it has taken so long for black women to be seen, heard, and acknowledged for our contributions to society and the inequity we endure daily with regard to viability and livability. But also excited that we are no longer the invisible marginalized group.
I have personally lived in Cleveland for decades and have experienced every aspect of the oppression and disregard expressed in the Citylab article. I appreciate Mayor Bibb and the new administration for addressing a problem that will not only impact this people group but will improve our community overall. Because when you address the plight of the black woman you address the most prevalent issues that address our society as a whole; race, and gender.
As a black woman currently coping in the city of Cleveland of Ohio I am both saddened and excited by the possibilities of this conversation today. I am saddened that it has taken so long for black women to be seen, heard, and acknowledged for our contributions to society and the inequity we endure daily with regard to viability and livability. But also excited that we are no longer the invisible marginalized group.
I have personally lived in Cleveland for decades and have experienced every aspect of the oppression and disregard expressed in the Citylab article. I appreciate Mayor Bibb and the new administration for addressing a problem that will not only impact this people group but will improve our community overall. Because when you address the plight of the black woman you address the most prevalent issues that address our society as a whole; race, and gender.
Dr. Tisha Carter
Commission of Black Women and Girls (Ordinance No. 373-2022)
This is a statement by Molly Ryan, PharmD in support of the implementation of a Commission of Black Women and Girls, due to the emergent need to support Black women and girls in Cleveland. As a healthcare worker (pharmacy, Fulbright alumna in Public Health) who seeks to advocate for patients and has provided service in multiple Cleveland establishments and community organizations during the last several years, I am emphasizing the healthcare need and benefits of this ordinance. This Commission can benefit the health needs of Black women and girls not only through direct health-related advocacy, but also indirectly through positively influencing Social Determinants of Health (SDOH), such as matters of the family and community like employment, housing, access to transportation. This ordinance is of significant importance to the health benefits of Black women, since an individual's health outcomes are influenced by SDOH, potentially to a greater extent than the exact medical treatment received. Given the quantity and quality of advanced healthcare resources in Cleveland, it is within the city's responsibility and benefit to improve healthcare access and lower health risks for Black women, girls, and their communities. The Commission of Black Women and Girls (Ordinance No. 373-2022) is an important measure to achieve this goal.
Molly Ryan
The need for the Cleveland Commission on Black Women and Girls
As Chairwoman & Founder of the Women of Color Foundation (20 years ago), we are anxious and excited to bring our resources and network to bear for this amazing effort.
I am delighted to be personally involved at whatever level Mayor Justin Bibb, his administration, members of the Cleveland City Council, and others may believe that my 20 years of experience of working in this space and advocating for, and training black women and girls, may be needed.
By way of background information, we have a database of over 30,000 emails, 75% of which are women, and more specially, women of color. It is important to note, that for this effort to be successful we must collaborate with partners and allies from all aspects of the community. (No matter their race, gender, and their station in life)
We are all in this together, but it is time for black women and girls to be valued and appreciated as a force for a change and equity in the City of Cleveland.
I am delighted to be personally involved at whatever level Mayor Justin Bibb, his administration, members of the Cleveland City Council, and others may believe that my 20 years of experience of working in this space and advocating for, and training black women and girls, may be needed.
By way of background information, we have a database of over 30,000 emails, 75% of which are women, and more specially, women of color. It is important to note, that for this effort to be successful we must collaborate with partners and allies from all aspects of the community. (No matter their race, gender, and their station in life)
We are all in this together, but it is time for black women and girls to be valued and appreciated as a force for a change and equity in the City of Cleveland.
Alexandria Johnson Boone
Commission on Black Women and Girls
I implore each member of Cleveland City Council to pass emergency Ordinance No. 373-2022, relating to the creation of the Commission on Black Women and Girls. This morning and every morning Black and Brown women and girls wake up to a system that fails them. Racism and sexism against Black and Brown women is under-reported, under-investigated, and under-prosecuted. We must demand better from all of those involved in maintaining civil society. I am an educator. My girls deserve to live in a city and world where they have unbounded possibility. Black women and girls matter. Black women girls deserve better.
Arianne W. Thomas
Housing Code Enforcement Owner Occupied
I bought an Historical property at 3234 W 43rd St Cleveland Oh 44109 in Jan 2012 and left Berea, Ohio to start my life and the property was a foreclosure from a Wells Fargo Bank. It needed lots of repairs which I’ve spent 85,000 bringing it to code. I fell in love with this old butcher shop from the late 1800s and it will be designated as a Cleveland Landmark in June 2022 or so. Since then I’m 2019 Inspector To y Baraisic had pursued me for minor violations during August of 2019 for painting and minor repairs. However none of my neighbors have been written up for their homes which are worse than mine. I have been singled out “Selective Code Enforcement” which is considered criminal and I feel this is a poor way of handling these situations with homeowners that are low income to moderate income instead of working with them. I have not neglected my property and I was cited during a time right before the weather got bad in 2019 and I was going to fix and paint the next spring which I did. I was placed in a SIP program and since then put heavily under a microscope while my neighbors and neighborhood is in great disrepair along with drug problems and gunfire and theft. Home values are low here. I have cooperated in with my attorney in the program but I am being still treated hostilely. I feel my Constitutional rights to due process are being violated and I have the right to speak at my hearings but I am silenced by Magistrate Embry and held in a continuous loop where my legal correspondence from me and my lawyers aren’t being reviewed and the progress that I’ve done not being recognized and I am being harassed by Tony Baraisic the City’s Inspector who refuses to cooperate and work along with me to help complete my program. I am not a criminal and I am not a thug. I am struggling financially and I feel that code enforcement is being abused and the authority of those overseeing it are overstepping their authority as well. My rights as a home owner are being ignored and the violations are selective and not equal for the neighborhood and others here have gone years without doing anything to their properties. I know I looked them all up. This is illegal and is code enforcement harassment. I want City Council to decriminalize code enforcement for homeowners. It’s ridiculous the way it’s being handled. Councilwoman Jasmine Santana has helped me and Community Housing Solutions has spent along with me over $45000.00 this past year alone on my home and it’s very nice. There is a couple issues I’m working on but the magistrate is not following the guidelines for the SIP docket and this is causing me to not be able to provide food on my table for me and my mother who lives with me. This isn’t supposed to be happening and there needs to be intervention with City Council. I have so much more to say and elaborate on regarding my case and all that I’ve done please allow me to tell you in person one on one. Please let me go before City Council and plead my case to you. You are the legislative body that controls and manages housing code enforcement. Please help me call me. I have been physically sick and I’ll and almost ready for hospitalization because of how I’m being mistreated. I love my home and this isn’t the way to welcome me to Cleveland.
Eugene M Pate, II
Dirt bike use on city streets
I have been watching cleveland build parks for kids and young adults. Ball parks basket ball parks. Kids and young adults that have these dirt bikes have no place to ride or enjoy having fun on there bikes. An intercity dirt track that can be made from properties of vacant buildings and run by parks and recreation department. I'm an old dirt bike racer and rider and I had to travel a long ways to enjoy my dirt bike. Give the kids your adults a place to enjoy their bikes without having to brake the law. You have the tools too do this.
Thanks
Thanks
Dana A Sanvido
Tax Abatement Reauthorization, Ordinance 482-2022, as amended by the Committee on Development, Planning and Sustainability. Please provide my public comment to the full City Council. Thank you.
TO: The Cleveland City Council
FROM: Arthur Hargate, Ward 6
RE: Ordinance No. 482-2022
I am writing to provide public comment on the reauthorization of Cleveland’s Residential Tax Abatement program.
The bottom line is the tax abatement proposed reauthorization before Council as amended by its Development, Planning and Sustainability Committee doesn’t go nearly far enough to encourage housing equity in Cleveland.
The last several years of high end development in high end areas of the city has exacerbated the affordable housing crisis in Cleveland. The City of Cleveland’s (hereafter “City”) panicked efforts to increase its tax base due to population loss has functioned to increase inequity, racial segregation and income / wealth disparity. Meanwhile, developers and property managers of high end rental have gorged themselves on the largesse of the City’s taxpayers.
Council should immediately end tax abatements for market rate and luxury apartments. 85% abatement in the “hot” market neighborhoods is ridiculous, entirely unnecessary and an abusive insult to those of us that pay ever increasing real estate taxes in this city. Investors and developers need no subsidies whatsoever to build high end apartments. Council should also reduce the 15 year abatement term for anything other than affordable housing.
Council should provide robust incentives for home renovation and first time home ownership. Council should also end the giveaway to remote investor developers and property managers extracting the economic vibrancy from our neighborhoods in excess rents. This will serve to restore much needed cash flows to Cleveland schools, libraries and the Metroparks.
Further, the Area Medium Income should be pegged to that which it is in the City itself, and the $20,000 fee to enable affordable units is absurdly low at $20,000. Tax abatements should be limited to one in a lifetime so that people cannot move from abated property to abated property and never pay property taxes in the City.
This current legislation as amended isn’t transformative in terms of equity, and it can and should be. It doesn’t do enough for forgotten neighborhoods and their disenfranchised residents, and the legislation appears to still cater too much to the posh, the privileged and the powerful in our community.
An unvarnished and common sense driven perspective on tax abatement is shared by many, many Cleveland residents who have witnessed the ugly, unfair and inequitable effects of this policy for decades, both at a macro and ground level.
It’s time to stop catering to the well-to-do and finally do something bold with tax abatement policy to help address directly Cleveland’s two critically debilitating issues: affordable housing and poverty. Doing something bold with tax abatement policy now can create significant velocity in that direction.
Conceptually the legislation of course makes sense and is long overdue, after almost twenty years of allowing the affordable housing crisis to proliferate, but even in committee Council seems to water down provisions that other major cities have had in place for years, so as to make the developers, banks and property investor elite happy.
Many worthy organizations involved in making recommendations to the City appear to have also been especially tactful, seemingly to not alienate the powerful, influential and well-connected investor, developer and contractor community, as well as their ubiquitous power-broker attorneys. Are we that desperate to encourage population growth and tax revenues (other than property) that we must make the finance, investment and real estate community wealthier to an extreme while forgotten citizens in forgotten neighborhoods see their infrastructure crumble around them?
The obsequious catering to profits before people was obvious in the 2020 Tax Abatement Report and the 2030 Equity Housing Plan. There were many good things in both but also monumental accommodation, as no one appears to be willing to be clear and call out the way the posh, privileged and powerful in our city have profited for decades by driving a civic agenda that has had the net effect of helping to keep poor people poor and living in costly, substandard housing.
You’ve heard this from many smart people and its true: poverty is a policy choice, and it wasn’t a policy choice of our government officials here. It was a policy of the power elite in the greater Cleveland area, of which the finance, investment and real estate cabal is an integral part and driving force.
It was their policy towards economic and property development that focused on the downtown playground for the well-to-do and a handful of Cleveland’s neighborhoods. It was their policy that refused to acknowledge and attack directly endemic poverty, overwhelming racism and housing discrimination in a truly effective way. It was their policy that to this day rewards rich people for catering to rich people.
Every stratum of the real estate market here has been poached by investors, and as a result affordable housing is in crisis and poor people have only stayed poor. We remain the poorest big city in the United States, and every economic development decision in the City must now be viewed through the filter of this one question: what directly will this do for poor people in poorer neighborhoods in this city? That exact question must be asked of the reauthorized tax abatement policy.
It is clear that our tax abatement policy and practices have contributed to both entrenched problems: lack of affordable housing and poverty, saying nothing of the money it has stripped from our schools. Increased urban density in certain “chosen” areas to get income tax revenue, other regressive taxes and retail activity never “trickles down” to actually address either problem in a meaningful way and largely just benefits the Cleveland power elite.
Take a ride around Gates Mills, Hunting Valley, Chagrin Falls or Pepper Pike. Then take a ride around some of our forgotten Eastside neighborhoods and tell me this is not a fact.
The income and wealth disparity in this community is as stark as anywhere in the United States, and tax abatement policy has only served to help keep it that way. The suburban elites investing in real estate and pulling the strings have done quite well in taking advantage of this tax abatement policy. Those living in Cleveland’s neglected neighborhoods have not.
Yes, tax abatement is just one tool and we need to use a big tool kit to get on top of affordable housing and poverty, but tax abatement policy must be used boldly going forward in its next iteration to preferentially help Cleveland’s most vulnerable, and I ask that you focus on amending the legislation in ways that will directly do that.
For too long developers, many with investment funding from outside the city, have profited handsomely building and acquiring, then becoming the property managers of high end rental. As well, we know that “vulture” investors have gobbled up tracts of cheap homes and rented them at exorbitant prices while letting them deteriorate.
Developers claim they are meeting insatiable market demand for high end rental. Intuitively, this makes no sense. A far more likely scenario is that the finance, investment and real estate cabal has successfully manipulated the market by squeezing the supply side and profiting from the run up in pricing and demand.
The tax abatement goodies have also been so lucrative that you have seen a proliferation of developers evolving to also become property managers of the high end rental they just built. The profitability must be staggering, and it would be wise to gain visibility to their economic model.
Developers have pocketed the tax abatement, played the spread between low cost to acquire land and buildings and high rent and have extracted the economic vitality of neighborhoods in excess rent. That’s one way that poor people stay poor, and moderate income people never get ahead. Every dollar spent on excess rent flowing out of the community to remote landlords is a dollar not spent on local goods and services, so how is that wise economic development for the City of Cleveland?
The market demand story is likely just another “big lie” created by crafty investor marketers. Who do you think funds the market studies that are promoting this lie of insatiable market demand for high end rental?
Rentals are filled because there is little or no affordable housing that can be purchased. There is no “silver tsunami” not conjured up and mythologized by investors, and truly independent studies reveal millennials would much prefer to buy a house if they only could, rather than throw their money away on stupidly high rent. But Wall Street has invested in high end rental and made affordable housing impossible to find, so we’re stuck with paying way too much for way too little.
People rent because they cannot afford to buy, because they rent and pay too much.
And all the while tax abatement was a key to making that lush deal for investors, developers and property managers pay off like crazy in Cleveland. Other cities acted years ago to stem this kind of feeding frenzy by rapacious real estate investors.
It also would be good to know exactly who is hiding behind those secretive LLC’s for high end rental projects or bulk acquisition of distressed homes? Investors from New York, Texas, Detroit, Hong Kong, Singapore, Moscow? We know the U.S. real estate market is a favorite for the international dark money laundering racquet. How much dark money is invested now in Cleveland’s high end rental real estate market? Would it be a good thing for the City to know that?
It’s time to end the money grab by investors, developers and property managers and help average and poor people in this city. End abatements for market rate and luxury rental. Assure we know who the investors are behind each real estate development LLC. Clearly understand how their business model works. Know exactly who is benefitting, who is paying and how much for each. Assure robust public participation in the property development project planning and implementation. Provide ample protections against gentrification.
Restore much needed cash flows to our schools, libraries and Metroparks. Provide highly scaled abatements that target forgotten neighborhoods and especially home renovation and first time home buyers. Give preference to owner occupied purchased homes and help lower income people get into them. Help keep seniors in their homes. Make homeownership the vehicle for wealth creation it should be in every Cleveland neighborhood.
Help people first, not corporations.
Cleveland can do this. One candidate for County Executive says we don’t think big enough; we don’t have enough big ideas. Here are a few.
Provide plenty of living wage jobs for poor people in Cleveland. Revitalize the poorer neighborhoods, refurbished and rebuilt by minority contractors and filled with local business fed by local investors. Assure every Clevelander has housing that is affordable for them in their income bracket.
Tax abatement policy can help. Please amend the legislation such that it preferentially helps our most vulnerable residents in every ward of the City.
Thank you,
Arthur Hargate, Ward 6
FROM: Arthur Hargate, Ward 6
RE: Ordinance No. 482-2022
I am writing to provide public comment on the reauthorization of Cleveland’s Residential Tax Abatement program.
The bottom line is the tax abatement proposed reauthorization before Council as amended by its Development, Planning and Sustainability Committee doesn’t go nearly far enough to encourage housing equity in Cleveland.
The last several years of high end development in high end areas of the city has exacerbated the affordable housing crisis in Cleveland. The City of Cleveland’s (hereafter “City”) panicked efforts to increase its tax base due to population loss has functioned to increase inequity, racial segregation and income / wealth disparity. Meanwhile, developers and property managers of high end rental have gorged themselves on the largesse of the City’s taxpayers.
Council should immediately end tax abatements for market rate and luxury apartments. 85% abatement in the “hot” market neighborhoods is ridiculous, entirely unnecessary and an abusive insult to those of us that pay ever increasing real estate taxes in this city. Investors and developers need no subsidies whatsoever to build high end apartments. Council should also reduce the 15 year abatement term for anything other than affordable housing.
Council should provide robust incentives for home renovation and first time home ownership. Council should also end the giveaway to remote investor developers and property managers extracting the economic vibrancy from our neighborhoods in excess rents. This will serve to restore much needed cash flows to Cleveland schools, libraries and the Metroparks.
Further, the Area Medium Income should be pegged to that which it is in the City itself, and the $20,000 fee to enable affordable units is absurdly low at $20,000. Tax abatements should be limited to one in a lifetime so that people cannot move from abated property to abated property and never pay property taxes in the City.
This current legislation as amended isn’t transformative in terms of equity, and it can and should be. It doesn’t do enough for forgotten neighborhoods and their disenfranchised residents, and the legislation appears to still cater too much to the posh, the privileged and the powerful in our community.
An unvarnished and common sense driven perspective on tax abatement is shared by many, many Cleveland residents who have witnessed the ugly, unfair and inequitable effects of this policy for decades, both at a macro and ground level.
It’s time to stop catering to the well-to-do and finally do something bold with tax abatement policy to help address directly Cleveland’s two critically debilitating issues: affordable housing and poverty. Doing something bold with tax abatement policy now can create significant velocity in that direction.
Conceptually the legislation of course makes sense and is long overdue, after almost twenty years of allowing the affordable housing crisis to proliferate, but even in committee Council seems to water down provisions that other major cities have had in place for years, so as to make the developers, banks and property investor elite happy.
Many worthy organizations involved in making recommendations to the City appear to have also been especially tactful, seemingly to not alienate the powerful, influential and well-connected investor, developer and contractor community, as well as their ubiquitous power-broker attorneys. Are we that desperate to encourage population growth and tax revenues (other than property) that we must make the finance, investment and real estate community wealthier to an extreme while forgotten citizens in forgotten neighborhoods see their infrastructure crumble around them?
The obsequious catering to profits before people was obvious in the 2020 Tax Abatement Report and the 2030 Equity Housing Plan. There were many good things in both but also monumental accommodation, as no one appears to be willing to be clear and call out the way the posh, privileged and powerful in our city have profited for decades by driving a civic agenda that has had the net effect of helping to keep poor people poor and living in costly, substandard housing.
You’ve heard this from many smart people and its true: poverty is a policy choice, and it wasn’t a policy choice of our government officials here. It was a policy of the power elite in the greater Cleveland area, of which the finance, investment and real estate cabal is an integral part and driving force.
It was their policy towards economic and property development that focused on the downtown playground for the well-to-do and a handful of Cleveland’s neighborhoods. It was their policy that refused to acknowledge and attack directly endemic poverty, overwhelming racism and housing discrimination in a truly effective way. It was their policy that to this day rewards rich people for catering to rich people.
Every stratum of the real estate market here has been poached by investors, and as a result affordable housing is in crisis and poor people have only stayed poor. We remain the poorest big city in the United States, and every economic development decision in the City must now be viewed through the filter of this one question: what directly will this do for poor people in poorer neighborhoods in this city? That exact question must be asked of the reauthorized tax abatement policy.
It is clear that our tax abatement policy and practices have contributed to both entrenched problems: lack of affordable housing and poverty, saying nothing of the money it has stripped from our schools. Increased urban density in certain “chosen” areas to get income tax revenue, other regressive taxes and retail activity never “trickles down” to actually address either problem in a meaningful way and largely just benefits the Cleveland power elite.
Take a ride around Gates Mills, Hunting Valley, Chagrin Falls or Pepper Pike. Then take a ride around some of our forgotten Eastside neighborhoods and tell me this is not a fact.
The income and wealth disparity in this community is as stark as anywhere in the United States, and tax abatement policy has only served to help keep it that way. The suburban elites investing in real estate and pulling the strings have done quite well in taking advantage of this tax abatement policy. Those living in Cleveland’s neglected neighborhoods have not.
Yes, tax abatement is just one tool and we need to use a big tool kit to get on top of affordable housing and poverty, but tax abatement policy must be used boldly going forward in its next iteration to preferentially help Cleveland’s most vulnerable, and I ask that you focus on amending the legislation in ways that will directly do that.
For too long developers, many with investment funding from outside the city, have profited handsomely building and acquiring, then becoming the property managers of high end rental. As well, we know that “vulture” investors have gobbled up tracts of cheap homes and rented them at exorbitant prices while letting them deteriorate.
Developers claim they are meeting insatiable market demand for high end rental. Intuitively, this makes no sense. A far more likely scenario is that the finance, investment and real estate cabal has successfully manipulated the market by squeezing the supply side and profiting from the run up in pricing and demand.
The tax abatement goodies have also been so lucrative that you have seen a proliferation of developers evolving to also become property managers of the high end rental they just built. The profitability must be staggering, and it would be wise to gain visibility to their economic model.
Developers have pocketed the tax abatement, played the spread between low cost to acquire land and buildings and high rent and have extracted the economic vitality of neighborhoods in excess rent. That’s one way that poor people stay poor, and moderate income people never get ahead. Every dollar spent on excess rent flowing out of the community to remote landlords is a dollar not spent on local goods and services, so how is that wise economic development for the City of Cleveland?
The market demand story is likely just another “big lie” created by crafty investor marketers. Who do you think funds the market studies that are promoting this lie of insatiable market demand for high end rental?
Rentals are filled because there is little or no affordable housing that can be purchased. There is no “silver tsunami” not conjured up and mythologized by investors, and truly independent studies reveal millennials would much prefer to buy a house if they only could, rather than throw their money away on stupidly high rent. But Wall Street has invested in high end rental and made affordable housing impossible to find, so we’re stuck with paying way too much for way too little.
People rent because they cannot afford to buy, because they rent and pay too much.
And all the while tax abatement was a key to making that lush deal for investors, developers and property managers pay off like crazy in Cleveland. Other cities acted years ago to stem this kind of feeding frenzy by rapacious real estate investors.
It also would be good to know exactly who is hiding behind those secretive LLC’s for high end rental projects or bulk acquisition of distressed homes? Investors from New York, Texas, Detroit, Hong Kong, Singapore, Moscow? We know the U.S. real estate market is a favorite for the international dark money laundering racquet. How much dark money is invested now in Cleveland’s high end rental real estate market? Would it be a good thing for the City to know that?
It’s time to end the money grab by investors, developers and property managers and help average and poor people in this city. End abatements for market rate and luxury rental. Assure we know who the investors are behind each real estate development LLC. Clearly understand how their business model works. Know exactly who is benefitting, who is paying and how much for each. Assure robust public participation in the property development project planning and implementation. Provide ample protections against gentrification.
Restore much needed cash flows to our schools, libraries and Metroparks. Provide highly scaled abatements that target forgotten neighborhoods and especially home renovation and first time home buyers. Give preference to owner occupied purchased homes and help lower income people get into them. Help keep seniors in their homes. Make homeownership the vehicle for wealth creation it should be in every Cleveland neighborhood.
Help people first, not corporations.
Cleveland can do this. One candidate for County Executive says we don’t think big enough; we don’t have enough big ideas. Here are a few.
Provide plenty of living wage jobs for poor people in Cleveland. Revitalize the poorer neighborhoods, refurbished and rebuilt by minority contractors and filled with local business fed by local investors. Assure every Clevelander has housing that is affordable for them in their income bracket.
Tax abatement policy can help. Please amend the legislation such that it preferentially helps our most vulnerable residents in every ward of the City.
Thank you,
Arthur Hargate, Ward 6
Arthur Hargate
Tax abatement
The city's residential tax abatement program is unfair and inequitable. A lot of people think that only justification for it is to expand the supply of affordable housing. So I urge you to restrict tax abatement for only that purpose.
But, short of that, I’d like to recommend some specific ways the current legislation should be strengthened.
First, the proposed legislation to renew tax abatement divides the housing market into three tiers — strong market, middle market, and opportunity market — with the percent of allowed abated value in each being 85, 90 and 100%. This differential is so small it’s meaningless. To have an impact, it should be something like 0% in strong markets, 60% in middle markets, and 100% in the opportunity markets.
Second, there’s an in lieu of payment of $20K/unit for the affordable housing set-aside requirement for multi-family developments. That seems way too low. Developers will just pay it to reap the larger windfall of the tax subsidy. It’s also too little to allow the city’s affordable housing fund to produce a unit of affordable housing. So the amount should be increased substantially.
Third, why do tax abatements have to run for 15 years? What research shows that this is the appropriate length of time? You should not be afraid of reducing the term — perhaps testing 5 years.
Finally, to quality for tax abatement projects must comply with the city’s green building standard. This is a really good requirement, but the standard should be strengthened, especially for new construction. The current options are for low levels of green building certification, such as LEED Silver, which is easy to achieve with modern building techniques. At a time of climate crisis, we should be requiring new buildings to have near net-zero for energy use.
In conclusion, the proposed tax abatement legislation moves the city incrementally in the right direction, but it needs to be strengthened in a number of ways.
But, short of that, I’d like to recommend some specific ways the current legislation should be strengthened.
First, the proposed legislation to renew tax abatement divides the housing market into three tiers — strong market, middle market, and opportunity market — with the percent of allowed abated value in each being 85, 90 and 100%. This differential is so small it’s meaningless. To have an impact, it should be something like 0% in strong markets, 60% in middle markets, and 100% in the opportunity markets.
Second, there’s an in lieu of payment of $20K/unit for the affordable housing set-aside requirement for multi-family developments. That seems way too low. Developers will just pay it to reap the larger windfall of the tax subsidy. It’s also too little to allow the city’s affordable housing fund to produce a unit of affordable housing. So the amount should be increased substantially.
Third, why do tax abatements have to run for 15 years? What research shows that this is the appropriate length of time? You should not be afraid of reducing the term — perhaps testing 5 years.
Finally, to quality for tax abatement projects must comply with the city’s green building standard. This is a really good requirement, but the standard should be strengthened, especially for new construction. The current options are for low levels of green building certification, such as LEED Silver, which is easy to achieve with modern building techniques. At a time of climate crisis, we should be requiring new buildings to have near net-zero for energy use.
In conclusion, the proposed tax abatement legislation moves the city incrementally in the right direction, but it needs to be strengthened in a number of ways.
David Beach
Blue Recycle Cans
When the decision to give everyone 1 black garbage can and 1 blue recycle can was made, it was made with recycling being mandatory and every house. But now because I dont want to recycle, you are taking our blue cans away, but not giving us a new black one. Where will all that trash go? The stuff we used to recycle will now be in the trash. We need an additional trash can now. This is why I know people throw the extra garbage on other dump sites in the area. Also, rather than PAY a company to pick up the blue cans we arent using, why cant we just keep them and use them around our yards? It is SAVE the city money!!!!!
Gregory T White
Complete Streets
Residents deserve & need safe streets for connecting with neighbors for walking to work for walking to the bus for playing (gasp!) in the street for riding bikes for crossing walks for block parties for building community for everything that HUMAN BEINGS DO!
For far toooooo long, we’ve made it to ez to drive everywhere. We ‘ve made it too EZ to drive fast & carelessly. It’s a national issue and a local one.
It’s in the best interests of the humans of this city to make drivers PAY ATTENTION by slowing down cars & trucks & allocating more space for bikes/people/scooters/etc.
For far toooooo long, we’ve made it to ez to drive everywhere. We ‘ve made it too EZ to drive fast & carelessly. It’s a national issue and a local one.
It’s in the best interests of the humans of this city to make drivers PAY ATTENTION by slowing down cars & trucks & allocating more space for bikes/people/scooters/etc.
John McGovern
Submissions are accepted up to 5 hours before a hearing if time slots are available