Making an In-Person Public Comment at An Upcoming Council Meeting
Council welcomes public comments at each regularly scheduled Monday evening Council meeting.
If you are interested in speaking at a Cleveland City Council, please read the revised rules and procedures for public comments and fill out the online form below.
Submitting a Registration to Speak
Anyone who is interested in addressing Cleveland City Council at a public meeting must register with City Council prior to that meeting.
Registrations may be submitted:
- By using the online form below
- In person at Cleveland City Hall, Room 220, 601 Lakeside Avenue NE. Paper forms are available to register.
- By downloading this form, filling it out, and emailing it to publiccomment@clevelandcitycouncil.gov or dropping it off at Council offices.
Registration Periods
Registrations will ONLY be accepted between Noon on Wednesday and 2:00 pm on the same day as a regularly scheduled Monday evening Council Meeting.
Council allows no more than 10 people to comment at its regularly scheduled Monday night meetings. Registration will close as soon as the first 10 people sign up. Each registrant will be allotted 3 minutes to speak.
Registrations will only be accepted for making comments at the next regular meeting; registrations for any future meeting will not be accepted until the Wednesday before the meeting. Early, incomplete, or false registrations will be rejected.
Notice of Registration
If your registration is successful, you will be notified by email or phone.
Accommodations
If you need assistance due to a language barrier or disability, please let us know at least three (3) days in advance by going here to make a request.
Attending Council Meetings
Cleveland City Council meetings are held in the Council Chamber on the second floor of Cleveland City Hall, 601 Lakeside Avenue, East.
Visitors may park for free at the upper lot behind City Hall after 5:00 pm on days when Council is meeting.
Public Record
Please remember that all registration information and public comments are public records and can be subject to public record requests.
Decorum
Cleveland City Council must maintain orderly, efficient, and productive meetings to ensure the important business of city government is completed. Council has developed a set of rules and procedures that allow the public to be heard in a fair and orderly manner. These rules and procedures apply to all speakers, and Council does not discriminate based on the speaker's identity or viewpoint or the content of the speech. Please read Council's revised rules and procedures for public comments before you register and before you appear before City Council.
Please note: Anyone attending a Cleveland City Council meeting is prohibited from engaging in any action or behavior that substantially interrupts, delays, or disturbs the due conduct of the proceedings of the Council; such conduct includes but is not limited to: handclapping, stomping of feet, whistling, making other loud noises, yelling, or similar demonstrations. Any person who violates any of the above may be immediately removed from the Council Chamber.
Rules for Speakers
- Speakers may not yield their time to other speakers.
- Speakers shall only address the topic they registered to speak about.
- Speakers' comments shall not be frivolous or repetitive.
- Speakers shall not use language that is obscene or likely to produce imminent unlawful action.
- Speakers shall address all comments to the presiding officer.
Prohibited Items
- Signs, posters, banners, placards, or similar items
- Food and drink
Make a Comment In Person at a Council Meeting
To sign up to speak during the registration period (Noon Wednesday through 2:00 pm Monday before Council Meetings) click this button.
You will be notified by email or phone if you are one of the ten people who will speak.
Make a Comment Online
If you would rather submit your comments in writing, please fill out the form below.
Written public comments will be published on this page and delivered to all Councilmembers before the next full Council Meeting after they have been submitted.
Public Comments
Filter By
Traffic Safety
On June 7th, my partner was struck by a car while biking down Quincy Ave, at Quincy and E 100th.
As he recovers, a shocking number of our friends and community shared that they have either been struck by a car while biking in Cleveland or knew someone who had also been hit by a car while biking in Cleveland. Even the driver at fault has been struck by a car as a cyclist. I wish I knew fewer people who have gone through this!
Quincy Ave does have a bike lane but it appears and disappears; it is not contiguous. It is not protected by posts, it is just paint. Long-term studies show that painted bike lanes do not measurably improve traffic safety for any road users. However, protected bike lanes increase safety for *all* road users.
I am begging City Council to commit to the Vision Zero platform adopted by the city instead of just talking about it. Do a comprehensive audit of bike infrastructure and identify where bike lanes can be extended and protected. Do this swiftly. Install speed tables. Make roads narrower for cars. Plant more trees in tree lawns. Commit to just one of these things, all proven to increase road safety for all users! I am sick to death of seeing vision zero stickers without seeing any actual changes to the road surface. I want to bike to a baseball game without fearing for my life. I never want to get a phone call that a loved one has been hit and is in an ambulance. I hope this never happens to any of you, but with the roads in the state that they are, I fear that it will just become more common.
As he recovers, a shocking number of our friends and community shared that they have either been struck by a car while biking in Cleveland or knew someone who had also been hit by a car while biking in Cleveland. Even the driver at fault has been struck by a car as a cyclist. I wish I knew fewer people who have gone through this!
Quincy Ave does have a bike lane but it appears and disappears; it is not contiguous. It is not protected by posts, it is just paint. Long-term studies show that painted bike lanes do not measurably improve traffic safety for any road users. However, protected bike lanes increase safety for *all* road users.
I am begging City Council to commit to the Vision Zero platform adopted by the city instead of just talking about it. Do a comprehensive audit of bike infrastructure and identify where bike lanes can be extended and protected. Do this swiftly. Install speed tables. Make roads narrower for cars. Plant more trees in tree lawns. Commit to just one of these things, all proven to increase road safety for all users! I am sick to death of seeing vision zero stickers without seeing any actual changes to the road surface. I want to bike to a baseball game without fearing for my life. I never want to get a phone call that a loved one has been hit and is in an ambulance. I hope this never happens to any of you, but with the roads in the state that they are, I fear that it will just become more common.
Lizzie Sords
Community Choice Electricity Aggregation Program (Ordinance No. 669-2023)
As the City of Cleveland relaunches their community choice electricity aggregation program to procure 100% renewable energy for Cleveland residents and small businesses, I am writing to express my strong support for the program as originally presented within the SOPEC Plan of Operation & Governance and considered in the committees of jurisdiction, as one of two Northeast Ohio Strategy Consultants for Power A Clean Future Ohio, but also as a Cleveland resident, concerned citizen, and environmental advocate.
First, we have seen over the last year how volatile the global fossil fuel energy market is in response to war, natural disaster, and other forms of disruption. Natural gas pricing often changes every 6 months and while sometimes, pricing can be lower, more often than not, that pricing is higher over the long run. Cities are now realizing that dependency on global energy markets and fossil fuels in general is not fiscally responsible, as climate change will only continue to bring disruption across our food, transportation, and energy systems. Locally or regionally-owned, installed, and distributed renewable energy systems are the most resilient option to weather fluctuating prices, brown-outs, outages, destruction of infrastructure by storms, high winds, extreme heat, and increased rainfall, and other disruptions to services, transmission, and infrastructure that we already see across Cleveland regularly. Once installed, renewable energy is price stable over the lifetime of its operation.
Second, Cleveland made its mark as one of the very first Ohio cities to transition all residents to 100% renewable energy with its community choice aggregation plan back in 2018, but now we are the furthest behind in terms of actual implementation of this plan. Columbus and Cincinnati are further along than Cleveland is, both in terms of community choice aggregation, but also in terms of updated and sensible zoning, codes, and policies for affordable climate-resilient housing, net-zero building policies, multimodal transportation, healthy tree canopy, and renewable energy procurement, local installation & generation, and community ownership. As the state with the second to lowest in-state renewable energy generation in the nation, cities across the state of the Ohio can make their voices heard and push the market to more in-state renewable energy generation through community choice aggregation, and the purchase of RECs, moving from out-of-state or out-of-region purchase of RECs to required purchase of in-state or in-region RECs, signaling to the market that more in-state generation is desirable.
Finally, this is a public health and environmental justice issue. Why consider opting-in residents to a default 'brown power' option, when we know this brown power contributes to poor air quality, high asthma rates, and increased risks of chronic health problems and cancer? When we are fully aware that Cleveland has some of the highest asthma rates, with some of the worst environmental justice metrics (due to redlining), and that we are still the largest, poorest city in the nation? Public health, environmental justice, and poverty are inextricably linked. Given the many other examples across the state of Ohio of 100% renewable energy community choice aggregation programs, residents are saving money and the choices we make for energy procurement in turn, address issues of public health and environmental justice by reducing the demand for brown power, often whose operations and generation are located near communities of color across our nation.
While I wish the program was being implemented before the First Energy price increase, at this point the delays between City approval and the start of service result from rigorous PUCO regulations for implementing an aggregation program. If the City makes large, material changes to the program as proposed, it runs the risk of further costly delays. I ask that Cleveland City Council pass Ordinance No. 669-2023 as considered in the committees of jurisdiction, ensuring 100% clean, renewable energy in its community choice aggregation plan. Separately and if desired, City Council can work to implement a plan to protect residents from the First Energy price increase in June and July as much as possible, and there are several local, amazing, and brilliant organizations across the clean energy, environmental justice, and environmental advocacy space that I'm sure would be willing to help you on this endeavor. However, this shouldn't interfere with this particular ordinance, as moving forward swiftly with renewable energy aggregation will limit financial hardships of customers facing rising utility costs and provide longer-term cost savings.
First, we have seen over the last year how volatile the global fossil fuel energy market is in response to war, natural disaster, and other forms of disruption. Natural gas pricing often changes every 6 months and while sometimes, pricing can be lower, more often than not, that pricing is higher over the long run. Cities are now realizing that dependency on global energy markets and fossil fuels in general is not fiscally responsible, as climate change will only continue to bring disruption across our food, transportation, and energy systems. Locally or regionally-owned, installed, and distributed renewable energy systems are the most resilient option to weather fluctuating prices, brown-outs, outages, destruction of infrastructure by storms, high winds, extreme heat, and increased rainfall, and other disruptions to services, transmission, and infrastructure that we already see across Cleveland regularly. Once installed, renewable energy is price stable over the lifetime of its operation.
Second, Cleveland made its mark as one of the very first Ohio cities to transition all residents to 100% renewable energy with its community choice aggregation plan back in 2018, but now we are the furthest behind in terms of actual implementation of this plan. Columbus and Cincinnati are further along than Cleveland is, both in terms of community choice aggregation, but also in terms of updated and sensible zoning, codes, and policies for affordable climate-resilient housing, net-zero building policies, multimodal transportation, healthy tree canopy, and renewable energy procurement, local installation & generation, and community ownership. As the state with the second to lowest in-state renewable energy generation in the nation, cities across the state of the Ohio can make their voices heard and push the market to more in-state renewable energy generation through community choice aggregation, and the purchase of RECs, moving from out-of-state or out-of-region purchase of RECs to required purchase of in-state or in-region RECs, signaling to the market that more in-state generation is desirable.
Finally, this is a public health and environmental justice issue. Why consider opting-in residents to a default 'brown power' option, when we know this brown power contributes to poor air quality, high asthma rates, and increased risks of chronic health problems and cancer? When we are fully aware that Cleveland has some of the highest asthma rates, with some of the worst environmental justice metrics (due to redlining), and that we are still the largest, poorest city in the nation? Public health, environmental justice, and poverty are inextricably linked. Given the many other examples across the state of Ohio of 100% renewable energy community choice aggregation programs, residents are saving money and the choices we make for energy procurement in turn, address issues of public health and environmental justice by reducing the demand for brown power, often whose operations and generation are located near communities of color across our nation.
While I wish the program was being implemented before the First Energy price increase, at this point the delays between City approval and the start of service result from rigorous PUCO regulations for implementing an aggregation program. If the City makes large, material changes to the program as proposed, it runs the risk of further costly delays. I ask that Cleveland City Council pass Ordinance No. 669-2023 as considered in the committees of jurisdiction, ensuring 100% clean, renewable energy in its community choice aggregation plan. Separately and if desired, City Council can work to implement a plan to protect residents from the First Energy price increase in June and July as much as possible, and there are several local, amazing, and brilliant organizations across the clean energy, environmental justice, and environmental advocacy space that I'm sure would be willing to help you on this endeavor. However, this shouldn't interfere with this particular ordinance, as moving forward swiftly with renewable energy aggregation will limit financial hardships of customers facing rising utility costs and provide longer-term cost savings.
Elena Stachew
Aggregation
June 5, 2023
Cleveland City Council
601 Lakeside Ave, Room 220
Cleveland, OH 44114
Dear Cleveland City Councilmembers:
As the City of Cleveland relaunches their community choice electricity aggregation program to procure 100% renewable energy for Cleveland residents and small businesses, we are writing to express our strong support for the program as originally presented within the SOPEC Plan of Operation & Governance and considered in the committee of jurisdiction (669-2023).
The Citizens Utility Board of Ohio (CUB Ohio) advocates on behalf of residential and small business utility customers to ensure cheaper bills, reliable service, transparency, consumer rights, and clean, healthy energy delivered equitably. With membership across the state, CUB Ohio works to address the climate crisis by cleaning up our energy systems and to combat systemic racism by working for environmental justice.
From experience we know that aggregation is a strong tool that local communities can use to deliver low-cost clean energy to residents and small businesses served by investor owned utilities (IOUs). Since the majority of Cleveland consumers are served by an IOU (FirstEnergy), aggregation is one of the most important tools available to the City of Cleveland to supply its residents with monthly cost savings together with affordably-priced clean energy and the reduction of risk and expense posed by future severe weather and other climate disruptions that clean energy provides. In fact, we can identify no option more affordable than aggregation to deliver all of these cost-savings to Clevelanders.
Based on our analysis of the public presentations and comments, we recommend that you implement this plan on a timely basis for the following reasons:
Low Cost:
• If consumers do not have access to the aggregation program, they will be subject to the First Energy default rate of $0.124/kWh. Once the aggregation program is implemented, consumers will be enrolled in a rate of approximately $0.069/kWh. As the average consumer uses approximately 1000 kWh/month, this represents a savings of $55.00 per month for at least twelve months. This greatly outpaces the cost of a delayed start of the plan, and locking in these savings ASAP is the most immediate and most effective tool available to the City of Cleveland to deliver savings to consumers.
• This bulk buying aggregation contract also provides access to low cost purchasing of clean energy that is already factored into the pricing and allow residents to participate in sustainability goals without having to directly purchase infrastructure (such as home insulation or solar panels) on their own property. However, since this program includes net metering, they can choose to invest in their own property without penalty.
Low Income Protections:
• City Cleveland of leaders are appropriately concerned about protecting low-income consumers from additional expenses. These consumers are currently served by the Percentage of Income Payment Plan (PIPP) and are not eligible for this program, so their monthly expenses are unaffected. PIPP is the program for low income residents who face a high monetary burden from paying their energy. While they will not receive the benefit of these savings, they will also not be impacted by the market fluctuations that have led to the high prices from the FirstEnergy default rate.
Strong Oversight:
• There is no long-term commitment to this current plan since pricing will only be locked in for 12 months. While this does open the residents up to the market in years 2 and 3, it also gives you flexibility to work with SOPEC to monitor the market and extend when the market is favorable.
• Council’s new authority to review the contract every 12 months ensures that you will have visibility into the performance of the contract and its track record of success or failure. Additionally, CUB Ohio is committed to offering counsel if and when desired by Council.
Savings Delivered ASAP:
• If this plan is passed without modifications, it will begin to deliver the $55.00/month savings as soon as possible. While we wish that this program was being implemented before the First Energy price increase, at this point the delays between City approval and the start of service result from rigorous PUCO regulations for implementing an aggregation program.
• If the City makes large, material changes to the program as proposed, it runs the risk of further costly delays. This would be detrimental to the City’s consumers because it risks both: a) a delay in the $55.00/month savings and b) the potential for the market price to rise, therefore lowering the $55.00 savings/month for the entire year.
Thank you for considering this letter. We appreciate your diligent oversight and advocacy on behalf of cost savings for Cleveland residents. Given that this plan delivers the greatest saving, both short- and long-term, to Clevelanders, we urge you to adopt 669-2023 as passed by committee.
Sincerely,
Daniel Gray
Citizens Utility Board of Ohio
Cleveland City Council
601 Lakeside Ave, Room 220
Cleveland, OH 44114
Dear Cleveland City Councilmembers:
As the City of Cleveland relaunches their community choice electricity aggregation program to procure 100% renewable energy for Cleveland residents and small businesses, we are writing to express our strong support for the program as originally presented within the SOPEC Plan of Operation & Governance and considered in the committee of jurisdiction (669-2023).
The Citizens Utility Board of Ohio (CUB Ohio) advocates on behalf of residential and small business utility customers to ensure cheaper bills, reliable service, transparency, consumer rights, and clean, healthy energy delivered equitably. With membership across the state, CUB Ohio works to address the climate crisis by cleaning up our energy systems and to combat systemic racism by working for environmental justice.
From experience we know that aggregation is a strong tool that local communities can use to deliver low-cost clean energy to residents and small businesses served by investor owned utilities (IOUs). Since the majority of Cleveland consumers are served by an IOU (FirstEnergy), aggregation is one of the most important tools available to the City of Cleveland to supply its residents with monthly cost savings together with affordably-priced clean energy and the reduction of risk and expense posed by future severe weather and other climate disruptions that clean energy provides. In fact, we can identify no option more affordable than aggregation to deliver all of these cost-savings to Clevelanders.
Based on our analysis of the public presentations and comments, we recommend that you implement this plan on a timely basis for the following reasons:
Low Cost:
• If consumers do not have access to the aggregation program, they will be subject to the First Energy default rate of $0.124/kWh. Once the aggregation program is implemented, consumers will be enrolled in a rate of approximately $0.069/kWh. As the average consumer uses approximately 1000 kWh/month, this represents a savings of $55.00 per month for at least twelve months. This greatly outpaces the cost of a delayed start of the plan, and locking in these savings ASAP is the most immediate and most effective tool available to the City of Cleveland to deliver savings to consumers.
• This bulk buying aggregation contract also provides access to low cost purchasing of clean energy that is already factored into the pricing and allow residents to participate in sustainability goals without having to directly purchase infrastructure (such as home insulation or solar panels) on their own property. However, since this program includes net metering, they can choose to invest in their own property without penalty.
Low Income Protections:
• City Cleveland of leaders are appropriately concerned about protecting low-income consumers from additional expenses. These consumers are currently served by the Percentage of Income Payment Plan (PIPP) and are not eligible for this program, so their monthly expenses are unaffected. PIPP is the program for low income residents who face a high monetary burden from paying their energy. While they will not receive the benefit of these savings, they will also not be impacted by the market fluctuations that have led to the high prices from the FirstEnergy default rate.
Strong Oversight:
• There is no long-term commitment to this current plan since pricing will only be locked in for 12 months. While this does open the residents up to the market in years 2 and 3, it also gives you flexibility to work with SOPEC to monitor the market and extend when the market is favorable.
• Council’s new authority to review the contract every 12 months ensures that you will have visibility into the performance of the contract and its track record of success or failure. Additionally, CUB Ohio is committed to offering counsel if and when desired by Council.
Savings Delivered ASAP:
• If this plan is passed without modifications, it will begin to deliver the $55.00/month savings as soon as possible. While we wish that this program was being implemented before the First Energy price increase, at this point the delays between City approval and the start of service result from rigorous PUCO regulations for implementing an aggregation program.
• If the City makes large, material changes to the program as proposed, it runs the risk of further costly delays. This would be detrimental to the City’s consumers because it risks both: a) a delay in the $55.00/month savings and b) the potential for the market price to rise, therefore lowering the $55.00 savings/month for the entire year.
Thank you for considering this letter. We appreciate your diligent oversight and advocacy on behalf of cost savings for Cleveland residents. Given that this plan delivers the greatest saving, both short- and long-term, to Clevelanders, we urge you to adopt 669-2023 as passed by committee.
Sincerely,
Daniel Gray
Citizens Utility Board of Ohio
Daniel Gray
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety; Cleaner Air and Better Health; Taking Steps Toward a Fifteen Minute City
IMAGINE -- A PLAN FOR "SQUARE TO SQUARE" CAR-FREE ZONE
Cleveland can create a more vibrant, people-friendly environment for Cleveland’s most important address, encouraging more shops and businesses to open, offering services to the public. Travel on Euclid Avenue, between Public Square and Playhouse Square, would be prohibited for cars, trucks and motorcycles, reserved for public buses, pedestrians, cyclists and micro-transit. Delivery vehicles servicing businesses would be eligible to use Euclid Avenue for deliveries between the hours of 2:00 am to 10am.
ADVANTAGES:
Improving public safety and reducing pedestrian and cyclist fatalities. Drivers struck and killed an estimated 7,485 people on foot in the US in 2021, a 12% increase to the highest levels in 40 years, an average of 20 deaths every day (2022, Governors Highway Safety Association). The percentage of speeding-related pedestrian crashes involving children ages 15 and younger more than doubled in the previous three years (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2022).
Providing cleaner air, helping to meet our climate change goals, by reducing traffic emissions. Traffic is the biggest source of urban air pollution, creating risk of serious health conditions, such as cancer, stroke and heart and lung disease and premature birth and childhood asthma. Transportation is a substantial source of particulate air pollution, a substantial pollutant compromising the health of Cleveland residents. Pollution poses higher, specific risks to children and the elderly.
Supporting better personal and public health through cleaner air, walking and biking. Air pollution kills around 7 million people/year, while physical activity can reduce the risk of at least 20 chronic diseases and conditions and provide effective treatment for many of these conditions. An inadequate level of physical activity is associated with $117 billion in annual healthcare costs.
Increasing real estate values for downtown properties. Street closing will increase walking and cycling, supporting economic growth, with new shops and stores opening to serve Cleveland’s “Square to Square” residents and visitors. We can analogize to the value added for proximity to greenways, where studies confirm that living near trails and greenways increases area property value an average of 3-5%, sometimes as high as 15%.
Helping to create Cleveland as a “fifteen-minute city,” where residents can meet their most frequent needs, such as work, school, shopping, child and medical care, in their neighborhoods, without driving a car or personal SUV. While Cleveland's population has steadily declined, stagnating at approximately 350,000 residents, the fastest growing neighborhood is downtown, with office to apartment conversions growing more common. Residents enjoy life in the center of the city. Helping meet the needs of this growing group is important for the life, vibrancy and fiscal strength of the city.
Source: Kevin Cronin, Attorney; The Brown Hoist Building, 4403 St. Clair Avenue, Cleveland 44103
216.377.0615; kevin.cronin.ohio@gmail.com
Cleveland can create a more vibrant, people-friendly environment for Cleveland’s most important address, encouraging more shops and businesses to open, offering services to the public. Travel on Euclid Avenue, between Public Square and Playhouse Square, would be prohibited for cars, trucks and motorcycles, reserved for public buses, pedestrians, cyclists and micro-transit. Delivery vehicles servicing businesses would be eligible to use Euclid Avenue for deliveries between the hours of 2:00 am to 10am.
ADVANTAGES:
Improving public safety and reducing pedestrian and cyclist fatalities. Drivers struck and killed an estimated 7,485 people on foot in the US in 2021, a 12% increase to the highest levels in 40 years, an average of 20 deaths every day (2022, Governors Highway Safety Association). The percentage of speeding-related pedestrian crashes involving children ages 15 and younger more than doubled in the previous three years (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2022).
Providing cleaner air, helping to meet our climate change goals, by reducing traffic emissions. Traffic is the biggest source of urban air pollution, creating risk of serious health conditions, such as cancer, stroke and heart and lung disease and premature birth and childhood asthma. Transportation is a substantial source of particulate air pollution, a substantial pollutant compromising the health of Cleveland residents. Pollution poses higher, specific risks to children and the elderly.
Supporting better personal and public health through cleaner air, walking and biking. Air pollution kills around 7 million people/year, while physical activity can reduce the risk of at least 20 chronic diseases and conditions and provide effective treatment for many of these conditions. An inadequate level of physical activity is associated with $117 billion in annual healthcare costs.
Increasing real estate values for downtown properties. Street closing will increase walking and cycling, supporting economic growth, with new shops and stores opening to serve Cleveland’s “Square to Square” residents and visitors. We can analogize to the value added for proximity to greenways, where studies confirm that living near trails and greenways increases area property value an average of 3-5%, sometimes as high as 15%.
Helping to create Cleveland as a “fifteen-minute city,” where residents can meet their most frequent needs, such as work, school, shopping, child and medical care, in their neighborhoods, without driving a car or personal SUV. While Cleveland's population has steadily declined, stagnating at approximately 350,000 residents, the fastest growing neighborhood is downtown, with office to apartment conversions growing more common. Residents enjoy life in the center of the city. Helping meet the needs of this growing group is important for the life, vibrancy and fiscal strength of the city.
Source: Kevin Cronin, Attorney; The Brown Hoist Building, 4403 St. Clair Avenue, Cleveland 44103
216.377.0615; kevin.cronin.ohio@gmail.com
Kevin Cronin
Community Choice Electricity Aggregation Program (Ordinance No. 669-2023)
As the City of Cleveland relaunches their community choice electricity aggregation program to procure 100% renewable energy for Cleveland residents and small businesses, we are writing to express our strong support for the program as originally presented within the SOPEC Plan of Operation & Governance and considered in the committees of jurisdiction.
Cleveland made its mark as one of the very first Ohio cities to transition all residents to 100% renewable energy with its community choice aggregation plan. We encourage City Council and the Administration to steward a swift and successful launch of the City of Cleveland’s next community choice aggregation program for customers in FirstEnergy territory.
It is critical Cleveland embrace the long term savings and environmental and health benefits 100% clean energy aggregation provides. As we are seeing across Ohio, aggregation is proving to be one of the most effective tools to both save money for residents and address our collective impact on climate change by reducing emissions. Other communities achieving cost savings through 100% renewable aggregation include:
Cincinnati ($.0495/kWh, 51% savings)
Columbus ($ .0799/kWh, 33% savings)
Dayton ($.0965/kWh, 11% savings)
Lakewood ($.06875/kWh, 45% savings)
Shaker Heights ($.0771/kWh, 38% savings)
Worthington ($.06935/kWh, 41% savings)
The City of Cleveland aggregation program is projected at $.0696/kWh, a savings of 44% over FirstEnergy’s Standard Service Offering.
Clevelanders are concerned about climate change and the most vulnerable community members will bear the brunt of the consequences unless we act now. One cost effective way to take action is with a 100% clean renewable energy aggregation program. It is the most impactful and immediate action Cleveland can take to address climate change. Implementation of a program that prioritizes support of existing renewable energy generation and development of local/regional renewable energy generation can immediately eliminate 20-25% of a community’s carbon emissions.
Additionally, due to the volatile fossil fuel market, electricity prices are rising this summer for FirstEnergy customers in Cleveland. Moving forward swiftly with renewable energy aggregation will limit financial hardships of customers facing rising utility costs and provide longer-term cost savings.
We ask that Cleveland City Council pass Ordinance No. 669-2023 as considered in the committees of jurisdiction, ensuring 100% clean, renewable energy in its community choice aggregation plan.
We applaud the leadership of the Bibb administration, Office for Sustainability, Public Utilities Committee, Finance Committee, and the entire City Council, and other city staff for relaunching the city of Cleveland’s community choice aggregation program. We urge you to stay the course and to see this effort through to fruition. This letter is an indication of the many stakeholders in the city of Cleveland that are behind you in this effort.
Respectfully,
SeMia Bray, Black Environmental Leaders
Dan Gray, Citizens Utility Board of Ohio
James Burton, Institute for Market Transformation
Rachael Belz, Ohio Citizen Action
Melissa English, Ohio Consumers Power Alliance
Brian Siggers & Emily Bacha, Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund
Joe Flarida, Kwame Botchway & Elena Stachew, Power A Clean Future Ohio
Tristan Rader, Solar United Neighbors
Don Bryant, Utilities for All
LINK: https://www.theoecactionfund.org/s/Cleveland-Aggregation-Coalition-Support-Letter-6523.pdf
Cleveland made its mark as one of the very first Ohio cities to transition all residents to 100% renewable energy with its community choice aggregation plan. We encourage City Council and the Administration to steward a swift and successful launch of the City of Cleveland’s next community choice aggregation program for customers in FirstEnergy territory.
It is critical Cleveland embrace the long term savings and environmental and health benefits 100% clean energy aggregation provides. As we are seeing across Ohio, aggregation is proving to be one of the most effective tools to both save money for residents and address our collective impact on climate change by reducing emissions. Other communities achieving cost savings through 100% renewable aggregation include:
Cincinnati ($.0495/kWh, 51% savings)
Columbus ($ .0799/kWh, 33% savings)
Dayton ($.0965/kWh, 11% savings)
Lakewood ($.06875/kWh, 45% savings)
Shaker Heights ($.0771/kWh, 38% savings)
Worthington ($.06935/kWh, 41% savings)
The City of Cleveland aggregation program is projected at $.0696/kWh, a savings of 44% over FirstEnergy’s Standard Service Offering.
Clevelanders are concerned about climate change and the most vulnerable community members will bear the brunt of the consequences unless we act now. One cost effective way to take action is with a 100% clean renewable energy aggregation program. It is the most impactful and immediate action Cleveland can take to address climate change. Implementation of a program that prioritizes support of existing renewable energy generation and development of local/regional renewable energy generation can immediately eliminate 20-25% of a community’s carbon emissions.
Additionally, due to the volatile fossil fuel market, electricity prices are rising this summer for FirstEnergy customers in Cleveland. Moving forward swiftly with renewable energy aggregation will limit financial hardships of customers facing rising utility costs and provide longer-term cost savings.
We ask that Cleveland City Council pass Ordinance No. 669-2023 as considered in the committees of jurisdiction, ensuring 100% clean, renewable energy in its community choice aggregation plan.
We applaud the leadership of the Bibb administration, Office for Sustainability, Public Utilities Committee, Finance Committee, and the entire City Council, and other city staff for relaunching the city of Cleveland’s community choice aggregation program. We urge you to stay the course and to see this effort through to fruition. This letter is an indication of the many stakeholders in the city of Cleveland that are behind you in this effort.
Respectfully,
SeMia Bray, Black Environmental Leaders
Dan Gray, Citizens Utility Board of Ohio
James Burton, Institute for Market Transformation
Rachael Belz, Ohio Citizen Action
Melissa English, Ohio Consumers Power Alliance
Brian Siggers & Emily Bacha, Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund
Joe Flarida, Kwame Botchway & Elena Stachew, Power A Clean Future Ohio
Tristan Rader, Solar United Neighbors
Don Bryant, Utilities for All
LINK: https://www.theoecactionfund.org/s/Cleveland-Aggregation-Coalition-Support-Letter-6523.pdf
Emily Bacha
Security place
To make more than a comment I want to make a request And it is that I would like them to place a mileage reader along with cameras so that the irresponsible who speed in this area are punished since there are children, schools nearby and they drive very recklessly no The time doesn't matter, whether it's day or all night, that's why I would love it if you could do something for Clark 44 st. Since we feel forgotten
Adriana
University Circle Inc. Proposed Special Improvement District
I am writing to express concern about the Special Improvement District (SID) requested by University Circle, Inc. (UCI). I live in Little Italy. While Little Italy is presently not included in the proposed SID, residents of Little Italy are well familiar with and sensitive to the manner in which UCI member institutions interact with their host communities.
It appears as if a relatively small number of large property owners are imposing their will on a large number of smaller ones. It’s not at all clear that the community will benefit much from the SID, but it is crystal clear that certain UCI member institutions will.
One wonders how UCI will expand the SID in the future, both in terms of imposition of costs for other services and projects, and in terms of the areal extent of the SID.
It worries me that there is little determined questioning of potential underlying motives and future implications of an SID that may not be transparent to the community now. Many people that live in host neighborhoods to UCI’s members institutions, based on their history, are correctly skeptical that all is what it is being sold as with the proposed SID. It feels very much like the camel is just getting its nose under the tent.
I suggest City Council defer a vote until UCI’s new leadership is in place, has an opportunity to assess the SID and can be thoroughly and vigorously questioned by UCI’s host communities that are entitled to a complete understanding of the future implications of the SID. Appropriate restraints and oversight must be in place with any SID to assure that the University Circle institutions’ host neighborhoods are properly informed, listened to and respected.
Thank you,
Arthur Hargate
Edgehill Rd., Little Italy, Ward 6
It appears as if a relatively small number of large property owners are imposing their will on a large number of smaller ones. It’s not at all clear that the community will benefit much from the SID, but it is crystal clear that certain UCI member institutions will.
One wonders how UCI will expand the SID in the future, both in terms of imposition of costs for other services and projects, and in terms of the areal extent of the SID.
It worries me that there is little determined questioning of potential underlying motives and future implications of an SID that may not be transparent to the community now. Many people that live in host neighborhoods to UCI’s members institutions, based on their history, are correctly skeptical that all is what it is being sold as with the proposed SID. It feels very much like the camel is just getting its nose under the tent.
I suggest City Council defer a vote until UCI’s new leadership is in place, has an opportunity to assess the SID and can be thoroughly and vigorously questioned by UCI’s host communities that are entitled to a complete understanding of the future implications of the SID. Appropriate restraints and oversight must be in place with any SID to assure that the University Circle institutions’ host neighborhoods are properly informed, listened to and respected.
Thank you,
Arthur Hargate
Edgehill Rd., Little Italy, Ward 6
Arthur Hargate
The cultural, economic and historical impact of Centro Villa
Thank you to City Council, Council President Blaine Griffin and Councilwoman Santana for their diligent work over the past 8 years to make Centro Villa 25 a reality. A special shoutout to Jeniece Contreras, her board and staff , and community residents.
State your name, affiliation and note that you are a Cleveland resident
Acknowledge the historical nature of tonight and 2023 City Council’s leadership and role in the realization of CentroVilla25, a long time vision of the Hispanic residents of Cleveland
Directly thank Council President Blaine Griffin and Councilwoman Jasmin Santana
Recognize City Council members (as a group not by name) for sending a clear message to the Hispanic community members in the City and region that nuestra gente están presente and add your eloquent comments
Tonight City Council stands as partners with a broad array of individuals and institutions who have embraced and invested in CentroVilla25. These include but are not limited to: Hispanics and host committee members who have contributed time, talent and treasure; corporations that have donated; other public sector entities such as County Council representative who contributed; a nonprofit that invested and challenged others to participate; and philanthropic entities that stepped up to recognize the local and regional benefits and wealth creation opportunities brought forth by CV25 through culture, community and commerce.
Gracias for … add your closing
A ve
State your name, affiliation and note that you are a Cleveland resident
Acknowledge the historical nature of tonight and 2023 City Council’s leadership and role in the realization of CentroVilla25, a long time vision of the Hispanic residents of Cleveland
Directly thank Council President Blaine Griffin and Councilwoman Jasmin Santana
Recognize City Council members (as a group not by name) for sending a clear message to the Hispanic community members in the City and region that nuestra gente están presente and add your eloquent comments
Tonight City Council stands as partners with a broad array of individuals and institutions who have embraced and invested in CentroVilla25. These include but are not limited to: Hispanics and host committee members who have contributed time, talent and treasure; corporations that have donated; other public sector entities such as County Council representative who contributed; a nonprofit that invested and challenged others to participate; and philanthropic entities that stepped up to recognize the local and regional benefits and wealth creation opportunities brought forth by CV25 through culture, community and commerce.
Gracias for … add your closing
A ve
Juan Molina Crespo
Community Benefits Legislation
I am providing public comment to urge City Council to maintain its focus on Community Benefits legislation that benefits all Clevelanders in the face of intense lobbying pressure, hysterical scare tactics and predictions of economic gloom and doom from the business and property development communities, if all Clevelanders should actually come to benefit from property and economic development in this City. Their influence is considerable, especially given their significant campaign contributions and philanthropic donations to gargantuan non-profit institutions that benefit mightily from incessant growth and development.
But always we must ask these questions of their positions: Who benefits? And who pays?
This much we know: the cosmic lie of “trickle-down” economic development decisions the last 50 years here is one very good reason why Cleveland remains one of the poorest big cities in the United States, with underfunded public schools, a devastated urban tree canopy, high rates of urban infant mortality, deep racial segregation and discrimination, crumbling infrastructure in certain neglected neighborhoods, a lack of living wage jobs, many dangerous streets, declining population and an affordable housing crisis.
If the business and property development community’s approach to economic development had worked, we would have made much more progress on these intractable problems the last 50 years. They have held considerable sway and dictated their policies and preferences to the Mayor’s administration and City Council for decades, and look at the results.
Why would we listen to them yet again and expect different outcomes? The people that live in Cleveland can no longer allow private interests to continue to gorge themselves at the overflowing trough of public money while poor people remain poor and the middle class in this City can’t catch an even break.
City Council needs to stand its ground and promote economic and property development that benefits ALL Clevelanders, not just the region’s posh, powerful and privileged.
Thank you.
But always we must ask these questions of their positions: Who benefits? And who pays?
This much we know: the cosmic lie of “trickle-down” economic development decisions the last 50 years here is one very good reason why Cleveland remains one of the poorest big cities in the United States, with underfunded public schools, a devastated urban tree canopy, high rates of urban infant mortality, deep racial segregation and discrimination, crumbling infrastructure in certain neglected neighborhoods, a lack of living wage jobs, many dangerous streets, declining population and an affordable housing crisis.
If the business and property development community’s approach to economic development had worked, we would have made much more progress on these intractable problems the last 50 years. They have held considerable sway and dictated their policies and preferences to the Mayor’s administration and City Council for decades, and look at the results.
Why would we listen to them yet again and expect different outcomes? The people that live in Cleveland can no longer allow private interests to continue to gorge themselves at the overflowing trough of public money while poor people remain poor and the middle class in this City can’t catch an even break.
City Council needs to stand its ground and promote economic and property development that benefits ALL Clevelanders, not just the region’s posh, powerful and privileged.
Thank you.
Arthur Hargate
NOISE POLLUTION
Greetings,
While I know there are numerous issues that the city faces I am writing about one that affects me daily. The public health crisis of noise pollution. Specifically the noise coming from the park behind my home. I know it may not be a concern to many who don't have the same issue. Believe me I could not fathom it before I had to live this nightmare. I live on Reservoir Place Drive behind Luke Easter Park and year after year as the weather warms up the car stereos and bass systems get louder and louder. My windows and glass table have actually vibrated from the sound. They park right behind my house and turn it up as loud as they can. Even if they are further away at the rec center the bass carries to my house. It is truly distressing. I cannot concentrate, I have migraine headaches and find myself being nervous and on edge due to lack of rest and just anticipating the noise.
The park is not even a safe or welcoming place for the children and families it is intended for as adults take over and blast music with explicit lyrics that can be heard far and wide right near the playground portion. These persons have no concern for the obvious disruption to the people living in the homes that are clearly visible to them and just feet away. The police do not respond to the phone call complaints of the noise. They simply do not come. I have to endure it until they decide to leave the area. I've heard it even while the little league teams play their games back there. They stay even after the dark, after 9:00pm when the park closes with the noise blaring. I need help and am asking for a reprieve from this torture. If there's something I can do short of approaching one of them again please let me know. I don't have peace in my own home. I plan to move soon, but of course the elevated interest rates and inflated housing prices make it a poor financial decision and a tough time to do so and it's sad that I am being forced out. I cannot understand why this type of behavior is acceptable.
While I know there are numerous issues that the city faces I am writing about one that affects me daily. The public health crisis of noise pollution. Specifically the noise coming from the park behind my home. I know it may not be a concern to many who don't have the same issue. Believe me I could not fathom it before I had to live this nightmare. I live on Reservoir Place Drive behind Luke Easter Park and year after year as the weather warms up the car stereos and bass systems get louder and louder. My windows and glass table have actually vibrated from the sound. They park right behind my house and turn it up as loud as they can. Even if they are further away at the rec center the bass carries to my house. It is truly distressing. I cannot concentrate, I have migraine headaches and find myself being nervous and on edge due to lack of rest and just anticipating the noise.
The park is not even a safe or welcoming place for the children and families it is intended for as adults take over and blast music with explicit lyrics that can be heard far and wide right near the playground portion. These persons have no concern for the obvious disruption to the people living in the homes that are clearly visible to them and just feet away. The police do not respond to the phone call complaints of the noise. They simply do not come. I have to endure it until they decide to leave the area. I've heard it even while the little league teams play their games back there. They stay even after the dark, after 9:00pm when the park closes with the noise blaring. I need help and am asking for a reprieve from this torture. If there's something I can do short of approaching one of them again please let me know. I don't have peace in my own home. I plan to move soon, but of course the elevated interest rates and inflated housing prices make it a poor financial decision and a tough time to do so and it's sad that I am being forced out. I cannot understand why this type of behavior is acceptable.
L. Ivory Shepherd
Submissions are accepted up to 5 hours before a hearing if time slots are available