Making an In-Person Public Comment at An Upcoming Council Meeting
Council welcomes public comments at each regularly scheduled Monday evening Council meeting.
If you are interested in speaking at a Cleveland City Council, please read the revised rules and procedures for public comments and fill out the online form below.
Submitting a Registration to Speak
Anyone who is interested in addressing Cleveland City Council at a public meeting must register with City Council prior to that meeting.
Registrations may be submitted:
- By using the online form below
- In person at Cleveland City Hall, Room 220, 601 Lakeside Avenue NE. Paper forms are available to register.
- By downloading this form, filling it out, and emailing it to publiccomment@clevelandcitycouncil.gov or dropping it off at Council offices.
Registration Periods
Registrations will ONLY be accepted between Noon on Wednesday and 2:00 pm on the same day as a regularly scheduled Monday evening Council Meeting.
Council allows no more than 10 people to comment at its regularly scheduled Monday night meetings. Registration will close as soon as the first 10 people sign up. Each registrant will be allotted 3 minutes to speak.
Registrations will only be accepted for making comments at the next regular meeting; registrations for any future meeting will not be accepted until the Wednesday before the meeting. Early, incomplete, or false registrations will be rejected.
Notice of Registration
If your registration is successful, you will be notified by email or phone.
Accommodations
If you need assistance due to a language barrier or disability, please let us know at least three (3) days in advance by going here to make a request.
Attending Council Meetings
Cleveland City Council meetings are held in the Council Chamber on the second floor of Cleveland City Hall, 601 Lakeside Avenue, East.
Visitors may park for free at the upper lot behind City Hall after 5:00 pm on days when Council is meeting.
Public Record
Please remember that all registration information and public comments are public records and can be subject to public record requests.
Decorum
Cleveland City Council must maintain orderly, efficient, and productive meetings to ensure the important business of city government is completed. Council has developed a set of rules and procedures that allow the public to be heard in a fair and orderly manner. These rules and procedures apply to all speakers, and Council does not discriminate based on the speaker's identity or viewpoint or the content of the speech. Please read Council's revised rules and procedures for public comments before you register and before you appear before City Council.
Please note: Anyone attending a Cleveland City Council meeting is prohibited from engaging in any action or behavior that substantially interrupts, delays, or disturbs the due conduct of the proceedings of the Council; such conduct includes but is not limited to: handclapping, stomping of feet, whistling, making other loud noises, yelling, or similar demonstrations. Any person who violates any of the above may be immediately removed from the Council Chamber.
Rules for Speakers
- Speakers may not yield their time to other speakers.
- Speakers shall only address the topic they registered to speak about.
- Speakers' comments shall not be frivolous or repetitive.
- Speakers shall not use language that is obscene or likely to produce imminent unlawful action.
- Speakers shall address all comments to the presiding officer.
Prohibited Items
- Signs, posters, banners, placards, or similar items
- Food and drink
Make a Comment In Person at a Council Meeting
To sign up to speak during the registration period (Noon Wednesday through 2:00 pm Monday before Council Meetings) click this button.
You will be notified by email or phone if you are one of the ten people who will speak.
Make a Comment Online
If you would rather submit your comments in writing, please fill out the form below.
Written public comments will be published on this page and delivered to all Councilmembers before the next full Council Meeting after they have been submitted.
Public Comments
Filter By
I am asking Cleveland City Council to extend the current moratorium and adopt strong, enforceable protections before approving any new data center.
These facilities are not ordinary commercial buildings. They can consume enormous amounts of electricity and water, require major grid and utility upgrades, operate industrial cooling equipment and diesel backup generators, and create continuous noise, air and light pollution near residential neighborhoods.
Before granting any permit, tax incentive, zoning change, or public assistance, Cleveland should require the developer to publicly disclose the project’s entire planned build-out—not just its first phase.
That disclosure should include the total acreage, peak electrical demand, expected annual electricity use, daily and annual water consumption, source of the water, wastewater impacts, cooling system, backup-generator emissions, projected noise levels, utility and transmission upgrades, tax incentives, and the actual number of permanent jobs.
The city must also determine who will pay for new electrical, water, sewer, road, and emergency-service infrastructure. Families and small businesses should never be forced to subsidize a multibillion-dollar corporation or bear higher utility costs because of its enormous resource demands.
Cleveland should require an independent environmental and community-impact study, paid for by the developer but selected and controlled by the city. It should examine cumulative impacts from all existing and proposed facilities—not evaluate each project in isolation.
Finally, residents deserve early notice, complete records, neighborhood hearings, and enough time to respond before any decision is made.
Technology should serve humanity—not consume our communities without transparency, accountability, and consent.
Please protect Cleveland’s people, water, land, air, electrical grid, and future before opening the door to irreversible development.
Thank you.
Sincerely, Deborah Scotello
Response from mayor upon conclusion of public comment even if that’s simply an acknowledgement, I’m not familiar with the concern, a variation of the statement: that concern will require additional details before being addressed. The feedback can even be provided at the next meeting. That’ll boost moral.
The Councilman of respective area provide a response with opportunity for others to chime in especially council president.
City issues, chief of department.
Comments aren’t simply to complain as much as to share suggestions, concerns and grievances.
REMEMBER
According to the Cuyahoga County Community Resource guide, an SID is a defined geographic area the purpose of which is to support the growth and development of a business district through services that enhance the area’s vibrancy, improve its safety and cleanliness, and attract investment. Ohio law allows for the creation of Special Improvement Districts” for business district improvements, special energy improvement projects, or shoreline improvement projects”.
The guidebook gives examples of the assessments levied for several SIDs in Cleveland Heights, notably Cedar-Fairmount, Cedar-Lee and Coventry which are comparable to Little Italy in size and number of businesses. Their annual budgets range from $66,000 to $165,300. The Gordon Square budget in Cle. is $133,663, each of these much lower than that of the proposed SID. Only the Cedar-Lee and Coventry examples show the documents that describe the properties that are levied assessments and it appears that the parcels on which levies are imposed are the businesses within the area, not owner occupied homes. For example, 75 parcels are taxed within the Cedar-Lee district and 18 parcels in Coventry.
In fact, the recently formed UCI SID explicitly excludes residences from the
tax, as do the SIDs in Cleveland Hts., both of which border Little Italy. Thus the sur-tax
on the SID will discourage and disadvantage owner occupied home ownership in Little Italy and encourage home ownership in other Cleveland neighborhoods that do not have this tax. Many longtime senior owners have been especially hit by the higher taxes due to development. Owner occupied housing is known to be crucial to communities for stability, maintenance, civic engagement, social capital, and economic benefit and has been a goal of the City Council and Mayor’s offices.
The predominance of businesses in Little Italy in the form of numerous restaurants, rental housing, airbnbs, parking lots, valet services, retail shops is more than adequate to fund an SID which by definition and Ohio law is meant for business development. Zillow alone lists 970 rental properties available in Little Italy and is a corporate manager of many of them. Case Western Reserve University has recently added over 800 residents to Little Italy for which it receives hefty room and board fees and, as a nonprofit, pays no taxes. Case also manages multiple fraternity houses on Murray Hill, other rental units, as well as parking lots. The majority of rental housing in Little Italy is occupied also by Case students such that the university should have an institutional investment in maintaining and supporting Little Italy.
As well said by resident Arthur Hargate, "Commercial enterprises, private equity investor property owners from afar, well-funded non-profit institutions and absentee landlords that extract economic value and substantial profits from Little Italy’s location, history, heritage and culture should be directly targeted to pay an amount that recognizes the massive economic benefit they enjoy from exploiting their presence in Little Italy. Commercial concerns, absentee landlords and nonprofits extract economic value from the neighborhood every day and therefore preferentially benefit from the services the SID Tax will fund."
For these reasons we are adamantly opposed to the establishment of this SID that will assess taxes on owner occupied dwellings in Little Italy, as such a levy would be unfair, taxing residents rather than businesses that would derive the most benefit, would discourage and be a detriment to owner occupied home ownership essential to a thriving community.
We request City Council to restrict the SID to businesses and institutions as intended by Ohio Law and to reduce the budget to the private police services cost of $170,000
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Lynn and Mark Singer
2079 Random Rd. 205
Cleveland, OH 44106
How is in that a “nonprofit” institution like University Hospitals is able to acquire the historic dwellings on an entire neighborhood street, intentionally allow them to deteriorate and then demolish them with NO PUBLIC INPUT, using our tax money. Shameful.
Submissions are accepted up to 5 hours before a hearing if time slots are available